Context: This is the third and final article that I had written a few years ago for a website that didn't happen. It feels rather short and choppy but I left it in tact. The assignments were to be around 500 words and a little snippy.
I find
the fields of music and film reviewing to be quite pointless. People
that aren't talented enough to create their own art always wash up on
the shores of mediocrity, willing and ready to tear down those who do
create.
A few
months ago, the band Sleep released their first new music in years. It was one song that ran for almost ten minutes called The Clarity. This song could melt your speakers when listened to at an appropriate
volume.
As I
went through the internets to find more information about the song, I
started to notice a fair amount of critics did not like what Sleep
had unleashed upon the world. Someone had complained that the vocals
weren't “growly” enough and the production was too clean.
In my
mind, if the band that brought us Dopesmoker were to record
their own chili farts and call it their new album, I wouldn't
complain. I might find it odd but I wouldn't complain. I would just
enjoy the fact that Sleep were making new music, which was my
reaction to The Clarity.
I want
to know what band “random internet reviewer” is in. Has this
person ever worked their ass off to put something other than his
complaints into the world?
I know
that I'm not in a band so I am very careful not to slag a record or a
band openly. With the exceptions of Nickleback and the Dave Matthews
Band and I only use them for punchlines involving douchebags.
I would
much rather not acknowledge the things I don't like and spend my time
and energy bringing attention to the things I do like. The anonymity
of the internet makes it so easy to tear down someone else's work. Some nameless asshole that is devoid of talent and ambition will
freely shit upon someone else's work at a moments notice.
And it
seems like most film reviewers either hate movies in general or fail
to realize that they are watching movies instead of documentaries. Film is a suspension of belief that requires the use of one's
imagination as the viewer is taken into the world created by the
filmmakers. If someone that watches movies for a living doesn't
understand that then maybe they shouldn't watch movies for a living.
There
is a film critic for a now irrelevant music magazine that feels
compelled to rip apart every movie he reviews. At some point, he
should either (A) make a film of his own to demonstrate to us
uneducated masses how a film should be made (B) try reviewing films
that he likes or (C) shut the fuck up. I encourage option C for most
people.
There
is something that needs to be understood: These critics that
contribute nothing to the artistic process but get paid to tear it
down get tons of free records and go to free screenings all the time. If these people would be cut off from their free access, maybe they
would put a little more thought into their work.
No comments:
Post a Comment